MORTGAGE FRAUD UNFORTUNATE GROWTH INDUSTRY –Statistics,
FERA, Adding Mortgage Fraud to Your Practice and Mortgage Fraud Types
By:
954-384-4557 Fax 954-384-5483
MORTGAGE FRAUD STATISTICS
Acting U. S. Attorney Jeff Sloman indicted
forty-one “un-professionals” on mortgage fraud on July 28, 2009. These un-professionals face a variety of
mortgage fraud charges involving $40 million in loans. The six separate cases
epitomize the insidious nature of mortgage fraud from purchasers to mortgage
brokers to real estate agents to lawyers, said Sloman.
Congress has appropriated $522
million in order to work towards higher mortgage standards. The money is to be
spent in fiscal year 2010 and 2011 that is from October 1, 2009 to September
30, 2011. The majority of the money is
for investigating and prosecuting mortgage fraud.
There are 2,440 pending FBI mortgage
fraud investigations, as of April 2009. This is more than double from the past
three years.
In total, mortgage fraud
suspicious activity reports in 2008 were at 63,173. They indicated more than
$1.5 billion in losses. So far, up to May 2009, there are 40,901 suspicious
activity reports.
Mortgage fraud cases opened in
2009 equaled 965, as compared to 136 opened in 2004.
During the fiscal year of 2008,
the FBI had 574 indictments and 354 convictions on mortgage fraud.
President Obama notes that last
year, the Treasury Department received 62,000 reports of mortgage fraud, which
is more than 5,000 each month.
The FBI has created sixty-five
mortgage fraud task forces/working groups.
There are over 500 new internet
pages a month regarding mortgage fraud.
According to acting U.S. Attorney
Nora D. Dannehy, most mortgage fraud cases involve false representations on
mortgage loan applications and inflated property appraisals. In fact, appraisal
and mortgage fraud cause an estimated 83% of all mortgages to be legally problematic.
Bank America, Wells Fargo &
Co., JP Morgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc – some of the biggest players
in the servicing industry – are all facing litigation.
In mid-July, the Federal Trade
Commission and the California Attorney General’s Office – in conjunction with
the state Real Estate Department and other agencies – jointly announced
lawsuits, injunctions and fines against 189 companies across the nation,
claiming they deceived troubled homeowners through mortgage modification and
foreclosure schemes.
While Taylor, Bean & Whitaker
Mortgage Corp. (TB&W), headquartered in
Los Angeles County Department of
Consumer Affairs director Pastor Herrera, Jr. noted that fraudulent foreclosure
prevention services were so bad and rampant that the category could top the
list of consumer complaints for 2009.
Governor Pat Quinn of
According to the Mortgage Asset
Research Institute, the states with the most significant mortgage fraud
problems in 2008 were Rhode Island, Florida, Illinois, Georgia, Maryland, New
York, Michigan, California, Missouri and Colorado (in that order).
Mortgage fraud may be pandemic and
not just epidemic. It is pervasive in our society. As previously stated,
Congress has devoted $522 million to prosecute mortgage fraud. The city, state and federal governments have
devoted tremendous resources to fight mortgage fraud. It has brought down top companies and banks
in
FRAUD ENFORCEMENT AND RECOVERY ACT
Fraud is a significant cause
behind the
FERA also offers the government
additional tools needed in order to crack down on the occurrences of fraud
that, unfortunately, have put numerous families at risk for losing their homes.
Additionally, FERA expands the abilities of the Department of Justice to prosecute
individuals and/or corporations responsible for predatory lending. Furthermore,
through the passing of FERA, a bipartisan Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
has been established in order to explore the financial practices that have
created our current economic crisis.
Under the Act, the following
amounts have been allocated to combat mortgage fraud:
|
Fiscal Year |
2010 |
2011 |
Total |
|
(in millions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
FBI |
$75 |
$65 |
$140 |
|
US Attorney Offices |
$50 |
$50 |
$100 |
|
DOJ- Criminal Division |
$20 |
$20 |
$40 |
|
DOJ- Civil Division |
$15 |
$15 |
$30 |
|
DOJ - Tax Division |
$5 |
$5 |
$10 |
|
Postal Inspection Service |
$30 |
$30 |
$60 |
|
HUD Inspector General |
$30 |
$30 |
$60 |
|
Secret Service |
$20 |
$20 |
$40 |
|
SEC |
$21 |
$21 |
$42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
$266 |
$256 |
$522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The United States 2010 fiscal
year begins October 1, 2009. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
According to the U.S. Attorney’s
office, they are attempting to fast track cases. In a case where the mortgage fraud is in the high
millions, they may decide just to prove one to five million dollars of fraud
and get a conviction with prison time instead of spending two years
investigating to the get the maximum penalty.
ADDING MORTGAGE FRAUD CASES TO YOUR PRACTICE
Now is the right time to add
mortgage fraud to your law practice. It has become the “hot topic.” It is usually the lead article of magazines
and newspapers. With the growing cases
of fraud, the government is seriously and aggressively pursuing guilty parties.
A vast amount of money is being provided to the FBI, the Attorney General, the
Department of Justice and other governmental agencies are working towards
tracking down fraud and punishing the guilty parties. Because of the rampant
outbreaks of mortgage fraud, it is a productive, worthwhile and rewarding area
of exploration.
According to noted criminal
defense attorney Brian H. Bieber, “The mortgage fraud industry has exploded to
depths no one could fathom. On the state and federal levels, prosecutors are
scrambling to find sufficient resources to arrest indict and convict
individuals. The targets are not just mortgagees, but are mortgage companies,
low, mid and high level executives. Many cases; however, are defensible.
Experienced criminal defense lawyers know which questions to ask, which
documents to look at and they can assist in pinpointing where the fraud began
and who is responsible under the law.”
Forensic mortgage fraud accounting can assist lawyers to determine the
proper questions and documents.
Fraud cases can be both criminal
and civil. Civil cases can involve
lenders suing mortgage un-professionals, appraisers, title companies and
private mortgage insurance companies.
DEFINITIONS AND TYPES OF MORTGAGE FRAUD
The word "fraud" traces
its origin from Latin to a Sanskrit word that means, "He bends
injures." The Black Law dictionary
defines fraud as “the intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of
inducting another in reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing
belonging to him or surrendering a legal right.”
Mortgage fraud can be committed
by:
1.
Application Fraud is the intentional misrepresentation of an applicant's
income, assets, liabilities, credit history, credit scores or job information.
2.
Real Estate Value Fraud is the intentional misrepresentation of the real property
value by a real estate appraiser or other professional.
3.
Real Estate Title
Fraud is the intentional misrepresentation
of the liens, judgments, lis pendens, survey problems or other "clouds on
the title" by a title company.
4.
Transaction Fraud is the participation in a real estate scheme to obtain a
loan though misrepresentation of facts.
There are two types of fraud:
1.
Fraud for Housing
2.
Fraud for Profit
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae do not
distinguish between Fraud for Housing and Fraud for Profit.
Frauds for Housing - The borrower
and/or other parties in a real estate transaction can misrepresent facts to a
lender to help a borrower obtain a loan and, therefore, a home. Other parties to the transaction include real
estate brokers, mortgage brokers, appraisers, title companies, closing agents,
lenders' account representatives, accountants, etc.
It is still fraud, no matter how
admirable the idea sounds that a "professional" is helping a customer
obtain a loan and hence a home. The lender should have the right to all the
facts and they should make the decision whether or not to loan to the
applicant. "This is not a noble
cause, this hurts our reputation," states Jack Nunnery, Chase Manhattan's
National Customer Risk Manager. Obviously, un-professionals profit from this
fraud.
Fraud for Profit - An investor
deceives a lender into making a loan so that the investor makes a profit. The investor may or may not have the help of
other parties in the transaction.
Investor fraud includes the following schemes:
1.
A Straw Buyer
2.
Land Flips
3.
Equity Skim
A Straw Buyer is a person used to
buy property to conceal the actual owner.
The Straw Buyer’s income and credit is used to fraudulently obtain the
loan. The Straw Buyer, the actual
property owner and anyone else involved in the scheme are guilty of fraud. Straw Buyers are sometimes used in the
following occasions:
·
Investors who want the
more favorable interest rate, loan-to-value and other terms available on owner
occupied property
·
Builders who want to
obtain working capital
·
Sellers who want to
illegally get money from their property
·
Borrowers who could
not obtain a mortgage on the subject property
A Land Flip is when real property
is bought at or below market price and is resold at a price higher than market
value. The higher sales price is used to
obtain an illegal higher mortgage loan amount.
The cooperation of at least a dishonest real estate appraiser is
necessary.
An Equity Skim example is as
follows: The real property owner obtains
a high loan-to-value mortgage on tenant occupied property. The owner collects rent from the tenant(s),
but does not pay the mortgage. The owner
skims equity from the property during the prolonged collections and foreclosure
proceedings.
Fraud can be committed by
misrepresentations on the following types of documents:
·
Application Documents
·
Appraisal Documents
·
Credit Reporting
Documents
·
Income Documents
·
Asset Documents
The red flags in these documents
are numerous. The most prevalent fraud is income documentation.
Unfortunately, the computer has
been a "double-edge" sword in the mortgage industry. On one side, it has provided technology to
speed up and automate mortgage processes.
On the dark side, with scanners, laser printers and graphic programs,
high quality fraudulent documents have been easier to create.
Conclusion
This is not the conclusion but the
beginning of a five to seven year window of unfortunate opportunity for the
criminal defense attorney to provide capable legal services to white-collar
defendants along with expert litigation support from forensic mortgage fraud
accountants. Take the time to explore
the idea of adding mortgage fraud to your practice.
------------------------------
Gary Opper is the
managing member of Levie-Opper, LLC, a mortgage fraud litigation support firm.
He has a CPA and a CFP license. Opper is past President of the FAMB -
©